Belgium’s Superior Health Council has published updated dietary guidelines for adults, reflecting a renewed commitment to tackling chronic disease through diet. While the recommendations are evidence-based and a marked improvement in clarity and public health focus, they fall short of integrating environmental sustainability in a way that aligns with other European frontrunners—most notably, Sweden’s just-released 2025 guidelines.
A Modern Health-Focused Blueprint
The new Belgian guidelines aim to reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, cancer, and dementia. Based on data from the 2022–2023 national food consumption survey and aligned with international standards, they offer clear quantitative recommendations for food and nutrient intake.
Highlights of the Belgian Guidelines (2025)
✅ Eat more:
- Wholegrains (≥125 g/day)
- Vegetables (≥300 g/day)
- Fruit (≥250 g/day)
- Legumes several times a week
- Unsalted nuts (20–30 g/day)
- Fish (≥200 g/week incl. oily fish)
- Water (1–2 L/day)
❌ Limit or avoid:
- Red meat (≤300 g/week)
- Processed meat (≤30 g/week)
- Sugary drinks & added sugars
- Salt (≤5 g/day)
- Alcohol (max 10 units/week)
- Ultra-processed foods (UPFs)
What’s Missing? Comparing to other European Countries Guidelines
Belgium’s guidelines reference the concept of sustainability—but stop short of embedding it meaningfully into the recommendations. In contrast, Sweden’s 2025 food dietary guidelines which was the latest country to update them are among the most progressive in Europe, integrating measurable environmental targets across all food categories. Sweden sets concrete goals to:
- Reduce food-related greenhouse gas emissions in line with climate neutrality
- Promote a 50–80% reduction in red meat and dairy intake
- Prioritise legumes, wholegrains and regionally sourced vegetables
- Offer quantified sustainability indicators to help consumers make climate-smart food choices
- Address biodiversity, water use and packaging across the food chain
Belgium’s approach—while sound on the health front—lacks this strategic alignment with climate policy and does not offer targets that would encourage a food system transformation.
Opinion Summary: A Thoughtful Update with Bold Potential
We welcome the Belgian guidelines’ focus on reducing disease burden and promoting clear, achievable behaviours.
However, we believe this update misses a pivotal opportunity to align dietary advice with global environmental targets. The growing body of evidence—highlighted by the EAT-Lancet Commission, FAO/WHO recommendations, and national leaders like Sweden, Finland and Switzerland —clearly shows that food choices must shift not only for personal health, but for the planet’s future.
Our Key Reflections:
- Sustainability is not optional: Dietary advice must reflect the reality of climate change and biodiversity loss. Consumers, industry and governments are all seeking clearer guidance.
- Plant-based promotion must go further: Legumes and nuts are encouraged, but Belgium stops short of encouraging substantial meat and dairy reduction, despite the environmental urgency.
- Food systems lens is lacking: Beyond nutrition, the guidelines should support local food chains, tackle food waste, and encourage circularity—pillars of the EU Farm to Fork strategy.
- The food industry needs clearer direction: Without quantified sustainability targets, manufacturers and retailers lack a framework for reformulation, sourcing and innovation that meets both health and environmental goals.
What Does This Mean for the Food Industry?
The food industry will be impacted in several ways—both directly and indirectly:
1. Reformulation Pressure
Food producers may need to reduce salt, sugar, and saturated fats, particularly in ready meals, processed meats, and snacks. Ultra-processed foods are now clearly under scrutiny.
2. Protein Shift
The caps on red and processed meat—and the encouragement of legumes and nuts—signal an inevitable demand shift. This presents a growth opportunity for plant-based brands and a challenge for traditional meat processors.
3. Dairy & Fish Stability
The continued inclusion of moderate dairy and fish consumption, unlike more drastic reductions elsewhere, will offer some reassurance to those sectors—but sustainability pressures may grow as EU targets tighten.
4. Transparency and Labelling
While not explicitly mandated, the trajectory points towards increased demand for transparency around ingredients, processing levels, and sourcing. Eco-labelling may follow in subsequent policy updates.
5. Missed Opportunities in Sustainability Innovation
By not going far enough in integrating environmental metrics, Belgium risks lagging behind in Europe’s sustainable food transition—potentially delaying innovation investment in regenerative agriculture, circular economy practices, and alternative proteins.
Looking Ahead
Part 3 of Belgium’s updated dietary framework—covering micronutrients and age-specific needs—is expected soon. But whether the Council will also revisit the environmental dimension remains to be seen. Food policy in 2025 must be fit for the future. That means not only preventing disease, but addressing climate, biodiversity, and equity—together.
Conclusion
Belgium’s 2025 dietary guidelines provide a strong public health foundation—backed by national data and global evidence. Yet, in an era of climate urgency and food system transformation, the absence of robust sustainability guidance is a missed opportunity. As consumer expectations evolve and the EU Green Deal continues to unfold, the food sector—and government—must consider how health and environmental policy can be aligned more boldly and coherently.
Belgium now has the chance to evolve its nutrition guidance into a truly double-duty framework—one that protects both people and the planet.
For more information:
